* Multiple users (team/org[anization]-wide task management)
@ 2007-09-21 15:00 Scott Jaderholm
2007-09-21 16:12 ` Russell Adams
2007-09-21 20:14 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Scott Jaderholm @ 2007-09-21 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: org-mode
Hi Org Users,
Does anyone use org-mode with multiple users? Do you just locate an
org file on a shared drive? Don't you have problems with only one
person being able to access the file at a time?
It's wonderful to be able to use org-mode individually, but when you
work in a team environment it would be really nice to all be on the
same system where you can assign tasks to others, act on tasks
assigned by others, and review tasks assigned to others.
One problem is, if the team can't use org-mode, then you can only use
org-mode in addition to whatever the team chooses, and often only with
some redundant work.
Does anyone have an idea how org-mode could work in a large team
environment without needing to add a ton of client-server code to
org-mode?
Or, if you've seen excellent task management software for larger
groups that you highly recommend I'd love to hear about that as well.
Thank you,
Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Multiple users (team/org[anization]-wide task management)
2007-09-21 15:00 Multiple users (team/org[anization]-wide task management) Scott Jaderholm
@ 2007-09-21 16:12 ` Russell Adams
2007-09-21 20:14 ` Carsten Dominik
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Russell Adams @ 2007-09-21 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Would one org file per team member, and a branched VC repository work?
This is completely off the top of my head.
Thing is, Bazaar-ng can auto-merge many of the changes since it is
flat text...
By having copies of the other team members, you can see agenda items.
Sync the branches once a day?
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 09:00:32AM -0600, Scott Jaderholm wrote:
> Hi Org Users,
>
> Does anyone use org-mode with multiple users? Do you just locate an
> org file on a shared drive? Don't you have problems with only one
> person being able to access the file at a time?
>
> It's wonderful to be able to use org-mode individually, but when you
> work in a team environment it would be really nice to all be on the
> same system where you can assign tasks to others, act on tasks
> assigned by others, and review tasks assigned to others.
>
> One problem is, if the team can't use org-mode, then you can only use
> org-mode in addition to whatever the team chooses, and often only with
> some redundant work.
>
> Does anyone have an idea how org-mode could work in a large team
> environment without needing to add a ton of client-server code to
> org-mode?
>
> Or, if you've seen excellent task management software for larger
> groups that you highly recommend I'd love to hear about that as well.
>
> Thank you,
> Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
------------------------------------------------------------------
Russell Adams RLAdams@AdamsInfoServ.com
PGP Key ID: 0x1160DCB3 http://www.adamsinfoserv.com/
Fingerprint: 1723 D8CA 4280 1EC9 557F 66E8 1154 E018 1160 DCB3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Multiple users (team/org[anization]-wide task management)
2007-09-21 15:00 Multiple users (team/org[anization]-wide task management) Scott Jaderholm
2007-09-21 16:12 ` Russell Adams
@ 2007-09-21 20:14 ` Carsten Dominik
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-09-21 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Scott Jaderholm; +Cc: org-mode
I don't currently share an org-mode files with others, but it seems
to me that you can very easily use CVS or something similar. Then
every user can work on their own copy of the same file. If
everyone sticks to his/her region in the file, merging will be very
easy.
Plain text does have its advantages.
- Carsten
On Sep 21, 2007, at 17:00, Scott Jaderholm wrote:
> Hi Org Users,
>
> Does anyone use org-mode with multiple users? Do you just locate an
> org file on a shared drive? Don't you have problems with only one
> person being able to access the file at a time?
>
> It's wonderful to be able to use org-mode individually, but when you
> work in a team environment it would be really nice to all be on the
> same system where you can assign tasks to others, act on tasks
> assigned by others, and review tasks assigned to others.
>
> One problem is, if the team can't use org-mode, then you can only use
> org-mode in addition to whatever the team chooses, and often only with
> some redundant work.
>
> Does anyone have an idea how org-mode could work in a large team
> environment without needing to add a ton of client-server code to
> org-mode?
>
> Or, if you've seen excellent task management software for larger
> groups that you highly recommend I'd love to hear about that as well.
>
> Thank you,
> Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>
>
--
Carsten Dominik
Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek"
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Kruislaan 403
NL-1098SJ Amsterdam
phone: +31 20 525 7477
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-09-21 20:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-09-21 15:00 Multiple users (team/org[anization]-wide task management) Scott Jaderholm
2007-09-21 16:12 ` Russell Adams
2007-09-21 20:14 ` Carsten Dominik
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).