From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Riley Subject: Re: notes in the agenda Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:08:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: <5yr4v63ley.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <87ipgiesye.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39602) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SORzi-0007be-3S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 07:08:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SORzg-0001Zs-He for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 07:08:45 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:45517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SORzg-0001Zf-BK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 07:08:44 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SORzd-0008JL-Fq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:08:41 +0200 Received: from 85.183.18.158 ([85.183.18.158]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:08:41 +0200 Received: from rileyrg by 85.183.18.158 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:08:41 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > Hi Richard, > > Richard Riley writes: > >> Now, whats the easist way to either (a, preferably) have the second agenda item display >> the *note* rather than the org item title > > There is no way to do this right now. > >> or (b, prefer not) remove it all together? > > I'd simply remove the timestamp from `org-log-note-headings', but I > guess you don't want that. > > Cheers, Thanks! While displaying the note (or start of the note...) itself in the agenda would be best (since notes are agenda/journal items in themselves), just replacing the %T with %t in the template for now avoids the duplicate agenda item.