emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Charles C. Berry" <ccberry@ucsd.edu>
To: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: Emacs Org mode mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Something to watch out for when including files
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:32:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.20.1609201609050.1040@charles-berrys-macbook.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y42mfvgw.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>

On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Eric S Fraga wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> just wanted to help others avoid spending a long time trying to figure
> out some strange (well, unexpected) behaviour in org...
>
> I have a document for which the LaTeX export was ignoring a
> #+begin_abstract ... #+end_abstract construct near the start of the
> document.  The text was simply not appearing in the LaTeX file.
>
> Long story short: I had a #+include: directive as the first line of the
> file which included an org file called preamble.org.  In that preamble
> file, the last headline had the tag :noexport:.  It would seem that this
> tag is not processed until after the include file has been included.  I
> hope that makes sense.  In any case, this means that my abstract was
> considered to be part of the noexport headline and was therefore not
> exported.
>
> Took me a very long time to figure out...  the simple solution was to
> remove that noexport section entirely from the preamble file.
>

I find myself in the habit of using inlinetasks tagged noexport for 
various things and that might serve you in this case. That is, convert the 
headline section to an inlinetask.

Another possibility is to use something like:

#+header: :exports results :results raw replace
#+NAME: import-include-dot-org
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
   (require 'ox-org)
   (org-export-string-as "#+INCLUDE: include.org" 'org t)
#+END_SRC

which will strip out headlines tagged with noexport during the babel phase 
of export (i.e. before parsing).

> I do wonder whether the org export approach (i.e. how it "includes"
> files) is correct but I can understand why the implementation is the way
> it is.

I agree about the implementation. Trying to make it smarter is asking for 
trouble.

Chuck

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-09-20 23:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-20 15:21 Something to watch out for when including files Eric S Fraga
2016-09-20 17:10 ` Adam Porter
2016-09-20 23:32 ` Charles C. Berry [this message]
     [not found] ` <58a8c0419a56444fb6956cd709d26dec@HE1PR01MB1898.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
2016-09-21  6:44   ` Eric S Fraga
2016-09-21 15:22 ` Giacomo M
     [not found] ` <b81ae1e313fc4a0c85fa5d63e3c29eb2@HE1PR01MB1898.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
2016-09-21 15:53   ` Eric S Fraga

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.OSX.2.20.1609201609050.1040@charles-berrys-macbook.local \
    --to=ccberry@ucsd.edu \
    --cc=e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).