From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jude DaShiell Subject: Re: [OT] Current website not very attractive Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 19:14:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39580) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Szbw3-0002sR-Jo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:14:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Szbw2-0006e2-AZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:14:35 -0400 Received: from shellworld.net ([69.60.117.94]:53261 helo=server1.shellworld.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Szbw2-0006dc-5f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:14:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Marcelo de Moraes Serpa Cc: Org Mode Good, that probably means it's one of the more accessible and usable web sites on the internet. On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote: > Hey list, > > Don't want to be negative, but doesn't anyone else also think the current > design is kind of amateurish and not very attractive? I also did not like > the screenshot used, I preferred the previous one, it showed more org > capabilities, and the colors and indentation looked better. > > My two cents and food for thought, > > - Marcelo. > Support your local church or synagogue, worship at Bank Of America! ---------------------------------------------------------------- Jude