From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jude DaShiell Subject: Re: org-mode documentation question Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:16:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:54204) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QZxoj-0002IB-Tv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:16:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QZxoi-0001yG-UA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:16:29 -0400 Received: from shellworld.net ([69.60.117.94]:64089 helo=server1.shellworld.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QZxoi-0001yB-Nm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:16:28 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server1.shellworld.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFDB22817 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:16:28 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org I just checked with make targets and the Makefile has no rule to show available targets. Such a rule would give builders a clue as to what additional possibilities exist with the Makefile if it existed. On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Jude DaShiell wrote: > Okay, I found the typing error I was making. I used make info but > neglected to use make install-info. So info was being made but not > installed. As soon as I used make install-info, and then ran info org > came up as version 7.5 on an info org command. I've done a few makes > already before I ever knew what org-mode was but this was the first one in > which once info documentation had been created the make install step > didn't automatically install it. One might do this in order to check > md5sum on a file before it was promoted to system-wide status or do things > with private versions but I can't think of other good reasons for this > build method. > > > >