From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Manuel Wiesinger Subject: Date ranges displayed in the agenda Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 12:10:36 +0200 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36917) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dkScY-0003MD-6E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 06:10:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dkScU-0001Qv-EN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 06:10:46 -0400 Received: from mehl.mmap.at ([37.48.122.148]:61279) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dkScU-0001Pg-7J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 06:10:42 -0400 Received: from [10.0.0.5] (195-230-45-149.adsl.highway.telekom.at [195.230.45.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mehl.mmap.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3853385548 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 12:10:33 +0200 (CEST) Content-Language: en-GB List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, when a headline starts with a date range, in the agenda it is displayed as part of the headline . When a headline starts with an normal date, the date is not displayed. For is example the following * <2017-08-23 Wed>--<2017-08-24 Thu> Test range * <2017-08-23 Wed> Test date is displayed like this: Wednesday 23 August 2017 testing: (1/2): <2017-08-23 Wed>--<2017-08-24 Thu> Test range testing: Test date Thursday 24 August 2017 testing: (2/2): <2017-08-23 Wed>--<2017-08-24 Thu> Test range Personally, to me as rather new user, this feels inconsistent. Is it expected behaviour or a bug? I experienced this with Org mode version 9.0.9 and 8.2.10. To make sure it's not configuration I checked with emacs -q. Manuel