From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6J70FVz/a2JfGgEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:08:12 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id aCOWFVz/a2K4VgEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:08:12 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10F1DFB04 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:08:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54582 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nkRdg-0002mn-BW for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:30:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60136) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nkRaJ-0006jU-06 for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:27:06 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:51775) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nkRaH-0005zP-0w for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:27:02 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1314240109 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:26:58 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.jp; s=2017; t=1651242418; bh=N9+laC11IszU8ubu3sBxCqUaeG6MXgojmwi4nZYqSYg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=nLFgmJlKD/rz8WE4ag4uV/24tzDzI6MXZafSCsCdCMln0X3w71SthESQBRGHT4JYo AoYxwn6FqA0Pw7e65lZYfyJnpm7O2lpVQuPv0EfWdDVbRz/HUPonYyT1NAOMZ0QhZR ddmBU9OIBWVv2tOD4M/epP7zv2NCdX6EZZWqWcl1fA+MX7saAoftHMPtaS7sAxg9Vn lUfo8p10+CPrRnSqzRS0wy+mOHZ6qmgPQdJhsTAn9D8MlGK/MnLECwrJFNI6F2MnNf /+MbPRZX+kY4/WEM2YRUHFA4N4qrArWeMmS1oV46p96V1z9vECrA+xQfhKyr7pT6ee KtR5grfl7kwag== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4KqZYt1Cppz6tnP for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:26:57 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:26:57 +0000 From: c.buhtz@posteo.jp To: Emacs orgmode Subject: Re: asterisk allowed for list items In-Reply-To: <87czh0vw2h.fsf@localhost> References: <78aed94a0114fd29322e6da7581161ec@posteo.de> <87pml06q6c.fsf@localhost> <87czh0vw2h.fsf@localhost> Message-ID: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=c.buhtz@posteo.jp; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1651244892; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=AF03tepSD0K4AqxRsKSMam9Y3qF9YSgdZ9rajPg/7UU=; b=ePlBXoqMuNCOSwNz8RKz4KW3ZepyOpnuTbLTmd861ZQd7DXzhqxdWFFAy8h/uJeno3J/Oi JAzqe7CYUMdCmjVq2LIUwS8u72Psnh9pzM83KxbnJOtol8w1gjNLkkPaKJJSzvTMV+Jo0J oP9ZpM1R/AIA5qDBi85HUvdMFMBfaqRYlGJZH60KDpoXje6CDarwhlEdJb+z0RQ0aSdrxK M+M4aUneuOuym6UjJG99WfHre4siixYYz7d/DGdnCGIpY8nbHKdK288vmRfHJG7OpsOfFV TLjNLvFXcLYhuRnE4lgqufNs1pqOb5Gp/Wi+3NZ+5I70GrOoGn6iwHJGucK5bA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1651244892; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=nEU+27D//IAwU8xuli4bh6eEYWgi0JDU5OKHcjL5GDZBGRun2LoP4SpNoxGEUBPrHjhMEa Wzbr0M6r2UcPp0KmCQKEoFqrSEEjahSVqHp7J7Vz0O9amZQy2RFfrtpXZBLcdwEipyEKQu ZGN0+5Zj0ZJcVinfV1p4afSUK5Vf1W2yECnf72CAzjIxVTJ8HcMux95XPvq7l2TxGtEUTd bGkdhkPHsUqIv7uNW9FucBdhqqP+U/mBNyiSzdHaF3tb8Zg8Xd6oJgrKraNwECLfHZOoBU MW1STtO5HfaEagjKIi5JOF0cIV9VebvK8/Dkce6AoA0MUyxGlmc4DD9OCXx+5Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.jp header.s=2017 header.b=nLFgmJlK; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.jp; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -9.80 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.jp header.s=2017 header.b=nLFgmJlK; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.jp; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 10F1DFB04 X-Spam-Score: -9.80 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: v16oN7092dIh Dear Ihor, thanks for your reply. Am 29.04.2022 15:49 schrieb Ihor Radchenko: > Exactly because you are actively trying to understand the syntax, you > are in unique situation where you can easily see all the "opaque" > places > in the syntax description. I still don't know if I misunderstand the syntax description document or if there is really and "error" in it. > That's why I ask you to propose modifications > to the document that would make it easier to read for you. First of all I have to understand everything and then write that down for my self (especially as Python code and unittests). My english is awful and it wouldn't help you. I even do not understand all words and sentences (from a language perspective) of the syntax description document. I am not into it enough to propose a patch. I can only offer you "my understanding" of the document and "testing" a new version of it.