From: Max Nikulin <email@example.com>
To: orgmode <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: Tom Gillespie <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: A simple Lua filter for Pandoc
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 23:29:26 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (raw)
On 04/01/2022 22:06, Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
> Max Nikulin writes:
>> Ideally it should be done pandoc and only if it causes incorrect
>> parsing of org markup. NBSP, probably, should be replaced by some
>> exporters, I do not think, it is a problem e.g. in HTML files.
> The reason for this filter is my own comfort. Linguistics texts contains
> a lot of certain characters such as "/" or "*", and they are often
> italicized or bold. So, in order not to be more confused than necessary,
> I prefer that they pass as entities.
It seems, lightweight markup is more annoyance than advantage for you.
Tom posted some thoughts on more rigorous syntax in the following message:
Tom Gillespie. Re: Org-syntax: Intra-word markup.
Sat, 4 Dec 2021 09:53:11 -0800.
For C and C++ it is possible to tune some aspects of compiler behavior using
directives. In some cases it might be convenient to e.g. temporary
disable emphasis markers (or switch to more verbose alternative) through
> In general, there are certain
> characters that I am more comfortable working with as entities than as
> literal characters (for example, a lot of zero-width combining
> diacritics that are used a lot in linguistics or epigraphy (and there
> are no fonts that include the NFC normalized version of all possible
> combinations: in fact, they are not in Unicode, and would have to go to
> the private use area). Summarizing, I prefer that these characters have
> their actual typographic representation only with LuaTeX. A very typical
> example is the character U+0323 (COMBINING DOT BELOW). It is very
> uncomfortable to work /in situ/, although there are fonts that usually
> render it well (with the 'mark' otf tag).
I have seen warnings concerning complications due to variants of
character representation, but I have no experience such nuances (either
typing and editing or processing text programmatically). Dagger and
non-breaking space in your code snippet were much more simpler cases.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-05 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-04 10:14 A simple Lua filter for Pandoc Juan Manuel Macías
2022-01-04 11:26 ` Timothy
2022-01-04 15:11 ` Juan Manuel Macías
2022-01-04 14:05 ` Max Nikulin
2022-01-04 15:06 ` Juan Manuel Macías
2022-01-05 16:29 ` Max Nikulin [this message]
2022-01-05 17:08 ` Juan Manuel Macías
2022-01-07 14:29 ` Max Nikulin
2022-01-07 15:14 ` Juan Manuel Macías
2022-01-04 16:28 ` Thomas S. Dye
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).