From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id yd6IELDoV2MQngAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:46:24 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id 8AZFD7DoV2MnWQEAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:46:24 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D05522B2BE for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:46:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1onKF5-0000IT-Pj; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:45:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1onKF3-00009g-Lq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:45:17 -0400 Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1onKEv-0005ri-RC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:45:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=l85U10ttESIrha+K1sBkFXOqQqYoEZ4VBYA6nfpC/co=; b=Tat/IkoTgoLKPrIVlq+CQEXIQ+ h1kx82VSdaBFyTXKL/6gVr3AnUcxH/nzih/QxLxoX2dBM71kK2pAPTWXGg66u7K3yHgcSgnVbp5GN hPEBUECBXZ/rxYHE3OB4yIHpB+xgTys3kEN47Bunau5o5CZa1inwDBFoMNGfBTcMDMMcG3KLGQwLo L62GRLeHe0U92YXAnpZHmriKWS2HOE636FGbS0pjMTB6nT40oCdFe9E9F5jiQXTcZWY8A/S9SIWgP gIcEiYuiFVoVzP4WRCCdWh4Cfu8KzuZf93sP5SGBTM92RSEqeTW+8NN67jWECm9TN0hCNuDsAOctY v8PsY2Ew==; Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1onKEs-00022v-Js; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:45:06 +0200 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:45:06 +0200 To: Tim Cross Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: GPL violation related to Org by priprietary app (was: Best android app) Message-ID: References: <6ce1e2e6-3d21-4ee0-9e3c-80f424984a60@gmail.com> <874jvvqhl7.fsf@localhost> <87a65ktl53.fsf@localhost> <87bkq0rvy0.fsf@localhost> <86k04om466.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6ft20Ooq82tMNwX9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86k04om466.fsf@gmail.com> From: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1666705583; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=l85U10ttESIrha+K1sBkFXOqQqYoEZ4VBYA6nfpC/co=; b=d+NzTimVk6cnhWj6EMYDxxnm9WKJLEtax8rT0Oj88WcBrJxD5k8h9qnU0ABPaMXfKN9UzK PLkug+9ff9D4r03AcopkLJ5a6yWQcagCXUrsDl7991XcSp8ljHNVTOMiwpeUkVfMgr3Tda uf1qJHyHBG/qVrCG8zMnZFfGLqi/8Tk/in58vKc6bVvX/KN6by5MDvrtYbRPu7r/51eUKV nJUpxNdB+tjo0O99uBg9TVxLZ9XUQG0J9LC+mqkv5iMf2po6mRx3UHqPfKmyWV4XP2gtBQ CWFLNWBfDLLG2dt2ImRmBEy/gAGJo30KDgAlpbLTUTMVZT2yIBPcIWqaXEPLAA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1666705583; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=J1GJR+GgKo9Kk+v3+us6gnwSd6cpUx62lUzYS3p/gVq8OIBsG6LXgiyIwSJqYhXxg64TZD 00i0xW/Va2nLPbxa3HqKoC8x2EVOBoYqU1t1rjfXgjTOeQU0+oGtC2NTSdb2JzNzyHzTKo upLm6hbVDO08K4LNgDKNH+at6O84GtavBSr7i/nN90lJyk1Dp0goGxCRchljz7Whd6v0Cy itUCGWIHuMJAcDNFdaGolPjbPO4iBXG9+ygE2j7APWFtHnPvdhaKME4B5bnR/dKCB4HG3u V9KWPo2fwfdOmSzBtru8CnzCr/mcvFPTo6BoCdjizxu5VcWPvLZUlh1Pyu1s3A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=tuxteam.de header.s=mail header.b="Tat/IkoT"; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -0.81 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=tuxteam.de header.s=mail header.b="Tat/IkoT"; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D05522B2BE X-Spam-Score: -0.81 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: VgdUnhbW5YHH --6ft20Ooq82tMNwX9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 12:12:46AM +1100, Tim Cross wrote: [...] > Even if it was violated, this is not something the maintainers are > empowered to act on anyway [...] This depends perhaps on what one understands by "act on". If that means "go to court" you are, of course, right. If that means just "make aware FSF legal of a possible violation", then the question here boils just down to "do we have enough confidence to justify annoying FSF legal with this? > Also, based on my limited legal experience and past dealings with > trademarks, copyright and licenses, I don't think there has been either > a GPL license violation or a trade mark violation. However, if someone > believes differently, they should refer the matter to the FSF legal > office. Exactly. Cheers --=20 t --6ft20Ooq82tMNwX9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCY1foXAAKCRAFyCz1etHa Ri7lAJ4tuZc18rXUJVv66hHA1eOfm3FrLACeJVo/ZaX5+EIXp1uPK54HR7BYXmw= =uG3g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6ft20Ooq82tMNwX9--