* Found my problem with date-stamping
@ 2008-10-13 20:10 Robert Goldman
2008-10-20 6:22 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert Goldman @ 2008-10-13 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
I use C-u C-c C-t followed by "d" when I mark my tasks as DONE so that
they move to the done state instead of waiting, which is the next state
in the progression.
Unfortunately, that prefix argument is, as far as I can tell, bound over
the entire process of marking the task as done. This means that when we
get to org-store-log-note, we bump into the following line:
(when (or current-prefix-arg org-note-abort)
(setq lines nil))
Which means that org carefully composes the note with the datestamp...
and then throws it away. Unfortunately, I don't really know what the
test for current-prefix-arg is here for, so I don't feel comfortable
just removing it. Can anyone offer enlightenment (this might be a good
place for an explanatory comment...)?
Thanks,
R
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Found my problem with date-stamping
2008-10-13 20:10 Found my problem with date-stamping Robert Goldman
@ 2008-10-20 6:22 ` Carsten Dominik
2008-10-21 19:42 ` Robert Goldman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2008-10-20 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Goldman; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Hi Robert,
thank you for digging into the code and nailing this difficult bug.
I have fixed it in GIT now, please confirm that it now works correctly.
Thanks.
- Carsten
On Oct 13, 2008, at 10:10 PM, Robert Goldman wrote:
> I use C-u C-c C-t followed by "d" when I mark my tasks as DONE so that
> they move to the done state instead of waiting, which is the next
> state
> in the progression.
>
> Unfortunately, that prefix argument is, as far as I can tell, bound
> over
> the entire process of marking the task as done. This means that
> when we
> get to org-store-log-note, we bump into the following line:
>
> (when (or current-prefix-arg org-note-abort)
> (setq lines nil))
>
> Which means that org carefully composes the note with the datestamp...
> and then throws it away. Unfortunately, I don't really know what the
> test for current-prefix-arg is here for, so I don't feel comfortable
> just removing it. Can anyone offer enlightenment (this might be a
> good
> place for an explanatory comment...)?
>
> Thanks,
> R
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Found my problem with date-stamping
2008-10-20 6:22 ` Carsten Dominik
@ 2008-10-21 19:42 ` Robert Goldman
2008-10-21 20:12 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert Goldman @ 2008-10-21 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> thank you for digging into the code and nailing this difficult bug.
>
> I have fixed it in GIT now, please confirm that it now works correctly.
OK, with version from git, turned off org-use-fast-todo-selection, went
to agenda, toggled a task to done with C-u C-c C-t d, and found the
right DONE timestamp in the corresponding orgfile.
Has been working all along with fast-todo-selection.
Looks fixed to me.
Best,
Robert
>
> On Oct 13, 2008, at 10:10 PM, Robert Goldman wrote:
>
>> I use C-u C-c C-t followed by "d" when I mark my tasks as DONE so that
>> they move to the done state instead of waiting, which is the next state
>> in the progression.
>>
>> Unfortunately, that prefix argument is, as far as I can tell, bound over
>> the entire process of marking the task as done. This means that when we
>> get to org-store-log-note, we bump into the following line:
>>
>> (when (or current-prefix-arg org-note-abort)
>> (setq lines nil))
>>
>> Which means that org carefully composes the note with the datestamp...
>> and then throws it away. Unfortunately, I don't really know what the
>> test for current-prefix-arg is here for, so I don't feel comfortable
>> just removing it. Can anyone offer enlightenment (this might be a good
>> place for an explanatory comment...)?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> R
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
>> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
>> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Found my problem with date-stamping
2008-10-21 19:42 ` Robert Goldman
@ 2008-10-21 20:12 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2008-10-21 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Goldman; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
On Oct 21, 2008, at 9:42 PM, Robert Goldman wrote:
> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> thank you for digging into the code and nailing this difficult bug.
>>
>> I have fixed it in GIT now, please confirm that it now works
>> correctly.
>
> OK, with version from git, turned off org-use-fast-todo-selection,
> went
> to agenda, toggled a task to done with C-u C-c C-t d, and found the
> right DONE timestamp in the corresponding orgfile.
>
> Has been working all along with fast-todo-selection.
>
> Looks fixed to me.
Excellent, thanks.
- Carsten
>
>
> Best,
> Robert
>
>>
>> On Oct 13, 2008, at 10:10 PM, Robert Goldman wrote:
>>
>>> I use C-u C-c C-t followed by "d" when I mark my tasks as DONE so
>>> that
>>> they move to the done state instead of waiting, which is the next
>>> state
>>> in the progression.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, that prefix argument is, as far as I can tell,
>>> bound over
>>> the entire process of marking the task as done. This means that
>>> when we
>>> get to org-store-log-note, we bump into the following line:
>>>
>>> (when (or current-prefix-arg org-note-abort)
>>> (setq lines nil))
>>>
>>> Which means that org carefully composes the note with the
>>> datestamp...
>>> and then throws it away. Unfortunately, I don't really know what
>>> the
>>> test for current-prefix-arg is here for, so I don't feel comfortable
>>> just removing it. Can anyone offer enlightenment (this might be a
>>> good
>>> place for an explanatory comment...)?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> R
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
>>> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
>>> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-21 20:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-13 20:10 Found my problem with date-stamping Robert Goldman
2008-10-20 6:22 ` Carsten Dominik
2008-10-21 19:42 ` Robert Goldman
2008-10-21 20:12 ` Carsten Dominik
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).