From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: only one [/] or [%]? Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:29:10 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87mydba0fl.fsf@gmail.com> <3C5BEEB1-BE4E-4093-B35E-5A73A89B728B@uva.nl> <87ab9abd81.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LSV5B-00022t-4B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:29:17 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LSV59-00022X-RP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:29:16 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47211 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LSV59-00022U-IX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:29:15 -0500 Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.78.144]:3126) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LSV59-00021s-1P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:29:15 -0500 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so110222eyg.24 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:29:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ab9abd81.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Richard KLINDA Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, something like that is already in, since yesterday, both for TODO items and for checkbox lists. Thanks! - Carsten On Jan 29, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Richard KLINDA wrote: >>>>>> Regarding 'Re: only one [/] or [%]?'; Carsten Dominik adds: > > >> On Jan 28, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Richard KLINDA wrote: >>> Hi, I have noticed that you can only have one [/] or [%] in a >>> headline. > >>> In an older version of org I used to use both in the same headline >>> and it worked. > >> Did that really ever work???? > > Yes, I'm pretty sure of that because I always used it that way. :) > >>> Is there some reason for this "regression"? > >> No, no reason, and progress has reversed regression in the GIT repo. > > :) > > I think this feature could be added with a one-line change in > org-list.el "(defun org-update-checkbox-count (&optional all)" > > ,---- > | OLD: continue-from (point-at-bol) > | NEW: continue-from (or beg-cookie (point-at-bol)) > `---- > > So now you can have: > > ,---- > | ** TODO [1/2] [1/2] [1/2] --- YIKES --- [1/2] [1/2] [1/2] > | - [X] foo > | - [ ] bar > `---- > > Please include this if you like it. > > -- > Udv, Richard