emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Carsten Dominik <drostekirsten@gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Change some defcustoms into defcont
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:50:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <F065764D-22ED-458F-8867-222FAC316881@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874n8avenk.fsf@gmail.com>

Dear Nicolas,

On Oct 21, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> wrote:

> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> The documentation of defconst says:
>> 
>>> Define SYMBOL as a constant variable.
>>> This declares that neither programs nor users should ever change the
>>> value.  This constancy is not actually enforced by Emacs Lisp, but
>>> SYMBOL is marked as a special variable so that it is never lexically
>>> bound.
>> 
>> So it is pretty clear about the intent of such a definition, which is
>> to never change it - even though it does not enforce it.
> 
> I must have been clear as mud, because that's exactly what I'm
> suggesting since the beginning of this thread: set "DEADLINE" and al. in
> stone, and never change them again.

You also said things like

> That's exactly the point of the defconst: you can still modify the
> variable, but it sends a strong message to the user. Also, it's not
> about deprecation: code base should still rely on these variables.

so maybe I picked one interpretation over the other.

> 
> I have been pointing out, though, that it would not break previous
> changes if they were done with `setq', according to how defconst are
> handled. But I never intended to make it a feature, nor did I suggest
> that was desirable.
> 
>> As you have said, we still want to allow users in principle to change
>> these variables.
> 
> No, I haven't said such a thing. I said, verbatim, "In principle, they
> mustn't be changed", which means quite the contrary.
> 
>> They have been defcustoms in the past, some people will have changed
>> them. Their setup will break when they switch to a new version.
> 
> Indeed. But that's easy to fix programmatically.
> 
>> That is why I object to changing their status. I think it causes
>> unnecessary breakage, and we can prevent this by keeping them
>> defcustom. Nothing is really gained by changing their status.
> 
> It fixes at least a bug, prevents headaches by simplifying maintenance,
> makes Org syntax more portable and more cache friendly. I wouldn't call
> that "nothing".

Yes, sorry.   By "nothing" I mean nothing we cannot achieve with documentation
and a :set method.  Since we will still rely on the variables, the advantage for
maintenance is something I do not see.  Cache friendliness I see, but I would think
that if someone changes these variables, they will not keep changing them.

> 
> Anyway, I have well understood that you don't want to change their
> status. So be it.

OK, thank you.

Regards

- Carsten

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-22  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-20  8:47 [RFC] Change some defcustoms into defcont Nicolas Goaziou
2013-10-20 18:23 ` Carsten Dominik
2013-10-21  8:56   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-10-21 10:26     ` Carsten Dominik
2013-10-21 10:51       ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-10-21 11:56         ` Carsten Dominik
2013-10-21 15:15           ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-10-22  7:50             ` Carsten Dominik [this message]
2013-10-22  9:52               ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-10-22 10:34                 ` Carsten Dominik
2013-10-22 18:28                   ` Torsten Wagner
2013-10-22 20:00                     ` Florian Beck
2013-10-23  8:56                   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-10-23 13:25                     ` Carsten Dominik
2013-10-29 14:04                       ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-10-29 14:11                         ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-11-16 20:25                       ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-11-16 23:55                         ` Carsten Dominik
2013-10-21  8:17 ` Sebastien Vauban

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=F065764D-22ED-458F-8867-222FAC316881@gmail.com \
    --to=drostekirsten@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=n.goaziou@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).