emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@uva.nl>
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns209@hardakers.net>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug or missing feature in undone repeating todos?
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:11:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <EDFA5B83-24BD-4DF3-89B7-9411BE2E964C@uva.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sdej2bc6ax.fsf@wes.hardakers.net>

In my agenda, his entry does show on Monday, as overdue for one day.

- Carsten

On Oct 20, 2008, at 11:20 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:

>
> I have a bunch of todos that I like to do "about every other day" so I
> do this:
>
>  * TODO foo
>    SCHEDULED: <2008-10-17 Fri +2d>
>
> The problem comes when I missed the date on Friday and am looking at  
> my
> agenda on Monday.  I'd like it to show that I'm overdue on that  
> instance
> of the task (since I didn't complete it Friday).  The next week,
> however, it doesn't show it on the agenda until Tuesday.
>
> IMHO, if today is beyond the date of a repeating todo it should be  
> shown
> today regardless of the repeat setting until I reset the date by  
> marking
> it done (and having it autoskip forward).
>
> (Actually, while I'm at it is there a way to get it to autoskip 2 days
> from today rather than 2 days from the date in the stamp?)
>
> -- 
> "In the bathtub of history the truth is harder to hold than the soap,
> and much more difficult to find."  -- Terry Pratchett
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-10-21  6:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-20 21:20 bug or missing feature in undone repeating todos? Wes Hardaker
2008-10-21  3:27 ` Manish
2008-10-21 13:14   ` Wes Hardaker
2008-10-21  6:11 ` Carsten Dominik [this message]
2008-10-21 13:14   ` Wes Hardaker
2008-10-21 13:37     ` Carsten Dominik
2008-10-22 15:58       ` Wes Hardaker
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-20 21:18 Wes Hardaker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=EDFA5B83-24BD-4DF3-89B7-9411BE2E964C@uva.nl \
    --to=dominik@uva.nl \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=wjhns209@hardakers.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).