On 25.9.2013, at 14:13, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> wrote:

> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> This sounds good to me.  How about allowing also a function
>> as a value and that function will receive the list of properties
>> and do with it as it pleases.
> 
> At first I thought about it but I realized that was exactly what
> a filter could do. Do we need to introduce redundancy here?

Not really.  It would simplify processing to have the list instead
of a string, but indeed, a filter can accomplish all of it.

Regards

- Carsten

> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -- 
> Nicolas Goaziou