From: Carsten Dominik <email@example.com> To: Bastien Guerry <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: Org Mode List <email@example.com>, "Dominik, Carsten" <C.Dominik@uva.nl> Subject: Re: Sticky Agenda buffer: Announcement and request for testing Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:58:11 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <EB0CC83D-DDAD-4B4D-986C-054F8C9EDF90@uva.nl> (raw) In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Hi Bastien, of course this is how I'd like it to work as well, but this was too hard for the moment... :( On Apr 3, 2012, at 7:33 AM, Bastien email@example.com wrote: > Hi Carsten and Max, > > "Dominik, Carsten" <C.Dominik@uva.nl> writes: > >> already in Januar, Max Mikhanosha had published the first >> version of his code to implement multiple agenda buffers. I have >> worked with him over the last few weeks, and we think that >> it is now quite stable. > > I've been trying the agenda-sticky branch a few times now and I love > this feature -- thanks a lot! > > One request: I often use buffer restrictions in combination with agenda > views. For example, I restrict to a first-level tree then run my daily > agenda on that tree. > > In this case, using sticky agenda is a bit confusing because I expect > a completely different agenda view while using the same agenda key (none > of the items in a tree are part of another subtree.) > > Could we have an option allowing a set of rules (or a set of agenda > views) for which we want the rebuilding to be done automatically? I > would turn on this for my daily agenda views. > > Thanks, > > -- > Bastien
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-03 6:58 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-03-11 12:48 Dominik, Carsten 2012-03-13 17:30 ` Manuel Hermenegildo 2012-03-13 19:21 ` Samuel Wales 2012-04-03 5:37 ` Bastien 2012-03-14 15:54 ` Rainer Stengele 2012-03-14 18:12 ` Max Mikhanosha 2012-03-22 9:57 ` Rainer Stengele 2012-03-22 10:12 ` Bastien 2012-03-22 11:04 ` Rainer Stengele 2012-03-27 11:46 ` Martyn Jago 2012-04-03 5:33 ` Bastien 2012-04-03 6:58 ` Carsten Dominik [this message] 2012-04-03 7:06 ` Bastien 2012-04-03 7:09 ` Dominik, Carsten
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style List information: https://www.orgmode.org/ * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=EB0CC83D-DDAD-4B4D-986C-054F8C9EDF90@uva.nl \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --cc=C.Dominik@uva.nl \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --subject='Re: Sticky Agenda buffer: Announcement and request for testing' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).