From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id zO5mFhfkrV4FaQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 02 May 2020 21:20:23 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id aBaIMCHkrV6jJAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 02 May 2020 21:20:33 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142::17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDDA4943BB3 for ; Sat, 2 May 2020 21:20:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54282 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUzYl-0005KE-Ty for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 17:20:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUzYC-0005Gn-Fq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 17:19:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUzYB-0001qy-WE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 17:19:56 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x432.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::432]:44761) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUzYB-0001ot-IA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 17:19:55 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-x432.google.com with SMTP id p25so3447556pfn.11 for ; Sat, 02 May 2020 14:19:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :subject:to:from:message-id; bh=ETD07YFGFfy/gbkT1ufXm/2V5/27PqbuvT+lxMiUP9A=; b=vfQlZF6R22dCMmNmggK8hnPHaaj21U8weCFq7IwfOv16R45dApX+OPcZDbzLzi0LM+ 8JgrwZf7HnzkBWE6fSGmZmD+g7uH60Ff0PSMwVAqbXAM+aiHS73FtzXJxhkg+K41wktN ZS+3lkAryMnWjokxvrQhHdMN4FD9e8+GxlzbIq6ZdHJJbWKKXZ7QGcXhpw2xJkq1F/V+ O6sjA9g+SJoDLC1JbLfPZdT8Zc8jW+QXJ9bHLrTTqUxQJB6IktcjbuXU14jwKVeqX+F4 CCJmSSaA549CuG9J1hC6jRGw83fXKv8o68nGLiVt+Lwt0SAdrSvQlmfWvyU2I9hAKGMQ oG5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:from:message-id; bh=ETD07YFGFfy/gbkT1ufXm/2V5/27PqbuvT+lxMiUP9A=; b=G9at8WgZ39DOP0VWev/VrbaLGIWAF1Hhow8paHoAh46ML8nCN3sVoByL6VSv2nO0s4 xyWuxNpm74grLdOAcKWExx5gaIFbhJGdDZ1yZBFswuvC9BlBKiHepvkGlUO0+Tv7sVh2 zTt//hX7nQS3B5D7NFrcrtrfAsY3FxMVAPkj/399qYN4L7VwY6gpu0i2sKN4jqIARi6p QAA5kMpukT9UOFy4C0tbiMJVqKIY+SxpbmT4yT0O7iCfCySXOE2+LtZhFZFXlBeEmCHv bdLSk6aGBQWXZgOcuEL/BvvqXH8Ua+DS2Eo7+TvAt3nRix9CxHdNtGdraqgEWSa58cq4 Ew+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaVD6+MUnrS4O2OfbdxYFYu/JYAS2PdytLEAa45u5vF0wKq0tlQ msL5+6Lz8mhmLEnD/NXPlsgb3zB+ X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJzYt8Crs1fz+TtJnGWvJPdoQe2BCMT16cMWSTvjND3q31xRMxae3tUUXkkKpapnJ8InwGj1Q== X-Received: by 2002:a62:1dd8:: with SMTP id d207mr10724628pfd.3.1588454393917; Sat, 02 May 2020 14:19:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from node-1w7jr9qt84zgp1tkl5dvc96fw.ipv6.telus.net (node-1w7jr9qt84zgp1tkl5dvc96fw.ipv6.telus.net. [2001:569:7c19:6000:b088:e549:b734:dc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u13sm2924723pjb.45.2020.05.02.14.19.52 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 02 May 2020 14:19:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 02 May 2020 14:19:49 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <3CBD8ED5-4D08-49D8-A120-4FCB68ACC9E5@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Can I "multi-include" a subtree? To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org From: David Rogers Message-ID: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::432; envelope-from=davidandrewrogers@gmail.com; helo=mail-pf1-x432.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: [-] PROGRAM ABORT : Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). Location : parse_addr6(), p0f-client.c:67 X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::432 X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: 0.79 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=vfQlZF6R; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 2001:470:142::17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [0.79 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.4949335890011]; MX_INVALID(1.00)[cached]; DWL_DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim,2001:470:142::17:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:470:142::/48:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.15), country: US(-0.00), ip: 2001:470:142::17(-0.49)]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:2001:470:142::/48, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[davidandrewrogers@gmail.com,emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[emacs-orgmode@gnu.org]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: A+ioKRpHVhhk On May 2, 2020 1:57:02 p=2Em=2E PDT, Samuel Wales = wrote: =2E=2E=2E you could maybe color the one that is in the file itself differently, or keep all looking equal status to the user=2E In my situation it would certainly be fine to have only the canonical/orig= inal subtree editable, as long as any edits to it automatically propagated = to the others=2E And the canonical/original one having a somewhat different= appearance from the others is not an issue for me one way or the other=2E --=20 David