From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Thomas S. Dye" Subject: Re: Differences html/pdf Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:02 -1000 Message-ID: References: <534212BF-E986-4F60-A4FB-BBD00DE08F0C@gmail.com> <877hufqyci.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N3DBt-00049U-1j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:24:13 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N3DBo-00043x-AR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:24:12 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50001 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N3DBn-00043k-V8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:24:08 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail-132.bluehost.com ([67.222.39.22]:34219) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N3DBn-0001sv-9y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:24:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877hufqyci.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, andrea Crotti , Carsten Dominik On Oct 28, 2009, at 6:26 AM, Bastien wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >>> In the latex version they're not exported for some reasons... >> >> That is correct, we have not implemented keeping all line breaks in >> LaTeX. > > I've searched around a bit, and to my big surprise, I cannot find a > LaTeX package preserving line breaks. I understand such a function > doesn't come along nicely with the general LaTeX philosophy, but it > should be possible after all... > > Did anyone already tried to find such a package ? > > -- > Bastien Aloha Bastien, Plain LaTeX has \linebreak and \nolinebreak, that might be appropriate. Tom