From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: embedded/inherited tags Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 14:07:46 +0200 Message-ID: References: <61176df0903280629g76b084cen50eec7fc0bb7271a@mail.gmail.com> <61176df0903300747n1f301d80v7733f4c055abd719@mail.gmail.com> <938fae2d0903300925p39534429t8c93bbdc9d6bca48@mail.gmail.com> <61176df0903311425mcd60f5ct474b6bbc7ff5caf8@mail.gmail.com> <20524da70903311515g545f65cem16c4c497da218d79@mail.gmail.com> <61176df0903311643v253b723en663fd28a8b083086@mail.gmail.com> <52ED26C8-3FD4-4E7C-B188-CA9DF4543740@gmail.com> <20524da70904011602y6c077c70x3598ed7fd28f0bef@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LqR8k-00075e-DM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 08:07:54 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LqR8g-000703-T7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 08:07:54 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52927 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LqR8g-0006zu-PG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 08:07:50 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f160.google.com ([209.85.219.160]:36086) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LqR8g-0003YF-6g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 08:07:50 -0400 Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so1772835ewy.42 for ; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 05:07:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20524da70904011602y6c077c70x3598ed7fd28f0bef@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Samuel Wales Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Apr 2, 2009, at 1:02 AM, Samuel Wales wrote: > Hi Carsten, > > On 2009-04-01, Carsten Dominik wrote: >> Did I really say I was going to make this, Samuel? > > I'll let you decide. :) > > Carsten earlier wrote: >> - Your proposal to use lisp syntax for agenda queries >> (Sep 16) is high on my todo list and not forgotten. >> Something I do want, but have not gotten around to. > -- from <77A37195-6E8E-4BEE-A05D-14B89A74904A@uva.nl> , > which has a few other items also. Clear enough, looks like I did say this. However, I have not done an steps in this direction, and I have not seen a really compelling case where this would ne needed. Useful, yes. > > Did I misinterpret? Of course, I will not hold you to it > either way. :) It seemed to me when I wrote to Konstantin > that the feature could be expected to happen at some point. > In any case, please accept my apology if that is a > misinterpretation, since I don't want to put words in your > mouth! > > I described some of the benefits of the optional Lisp syntax > in > <20524da70809152215y55dccdd3sd62d299b893ce287@mail.gmail.com> > "Re: Searching for tags or todo keywords". It's not a > critical feature, but it seems likely to solve the problem > in that thread (IIRC), and also help Konstantin a bit. I > would find it easy to use. > > However, the solution that I proposed to Konstantin can use > existing search syntax if he desires. > > Hope that helps. > > -- > Myalgic encephalomyelitis denialism is causing death (decades early; > Jason et al. 2006) and severe suffering (worse than nearly all other > diseases studied; e.g. Schweitzer et al. 1995) and grossly corrupting > science. http://www.meactionuk.org.uk/What_Is_ME_What_Is_CFS.htm