From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "T.F. Torrey" Subject: Re: Minor docstring bug: org-footnote-goto-previous-reference Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 00:26:17 -0700 Message-ID: References: <4CC37005.30406@sift.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47079 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P9uya-0000eY-Jl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 03:26:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P9uyW-0006ST-TX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 03:26:44 -0400 Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]:53880) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P9uyW-0006SC-Of for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 03:26:40 -0400 In-reply-to: Your message of Sun, 24 Oct 2010 08:57:35 +0530 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Noorul Islam Cc: Org Mode , rpgoldman@sift.info > Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 08:57:35 +0530 > Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Minor docstring bug: > org-footnote-goto-previous-reference > From: Noorul Islam > To: rpgoldman@sift.info > X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) > Cc: Org Mode > Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+tftorrey=3Dtftorrey.com@gnu.org >=20 > On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Robert Goldman wro= te: > > The docstring for the command "org-footnote-goto-previous-reference" is > > > > =C2=A0 Find the next previous of the footnote with label LABEL. > > > > ...which I can't actually parse. > > > > "Find the (immediately) previous reference to the footnote with label > > LABEL." > > > > Is that better? > > >=20 > Patch is attached. I modified it a bit. Noorul, Actually, your modification makes it grammatically incorrect. The word "immediately" is to modify the adjective "previous", and in English, an adjective needs to be modified by an adverb. So, "immediately previous" would be correct, but "immediate previous" is not. Trying to be helpful, not merely nit-picking, Terry > Fix doc string >=20 > * lisp/org-footnote.el (org-footnote-goto-previous-reference): Fix doc st= ring >=20 > Proposed by Robert Goldman >=20 > Thanks and Regards > Noorul > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode