From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: C-c ^ not fully useful Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:35:47 +0100 Message-ID: References: <86vc9p1kiu.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <87hal0pws8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38546) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9vTj-0004qV-HC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 05:40:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9vTh-0002M7-RF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 05:40:15 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com ([74.125.83.53]:33595) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uTR-00086A-63 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:35:53 -0500 Received: by mail-ee0-f53.google.com with SMTP id e53so1208429eek.26 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 01:35:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87hal0pws8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois_Pinard?= , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 25 feb. 2013, at 10:28, Bastien wrote: > Hi Fran=E7ois, >=20 > sorting list items and headlines is now done against the visible > part of the item and headlines, i.e., it ignores hidden links and > emphasis markers. Hi Bastien, are you sure it removes emphasis markers as well? Looks to me that = org-sort-remove-invisible only removes links. I guess it could be = rewritten looking at invisibility properties, but that might be = problematic when sorting includes a part of the buffer that has not yet = been visible in a window and therefore might not be propertized = properly. - Carsten >=20 > I am not sure it is useful to add a parameter to `org-sort-list' and > `org-sort-entries' to let the user change this default behavior: do > you have a significant use-case for this? >=20 > Fran=E7ois Pinard writes: >=20 >> - Could some parameterisation be added so one could map user written >> functions over (free) option letters? >=20 > Here again, my feeling is that it would be over-engineered -- would > you use it yourself? How? >=20 > Thanks for suggesting this improvements! >=20 > --=20 > Bastien >=20 --=20 Having an entire horizon of things you half-care about. -- Merlin Mann = in "Inbox Zero"