From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Exporter interface question Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 20:21:55 +0100 Message-ID: References: <871uc2t9z7.fsf@gmail.com> <8993D674-E5E6-4B8E-AE3C-75F694371459@gmail.com> <8738whsrx3.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip5cpwkx.fsf@gmail.com> <40E06D48-822F-4432-9D92-4F72AC866338@gmail.com> <87621cpqm5.fsf@gmail.com> <79ED4614-0209-4587-A8CE-343A7DBFAC3F@gmail.com> <871uc0p2kc.fsf@gmail.com> <2D69C12E-E2FF-4D1F-80AF-2676E68CE371@gmail.com> <87hakrte9k.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48135) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCaxT-0002x1-Ua for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 14:22:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCaxS-0002FS-T1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 14:21:59 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]:33095) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCaxS-0002FI-NI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 14:21:58 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id d46so618493wer.3 for ; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:21:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87hakrte9k.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Org-mode List OK, great. - Carsten On 4.3.2013, at 15:45, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Carsten Dominik writes: > >>> Then what about comparing base buffer for both entities? >> >> That would be the alternative, right. Do you think this would be >> preferred to what I am doing right now? > > I didn't realize you had already modified the code. I think both methods > are equivalent. > > Thank you again. > > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Goaziou