From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Berry, Charles" Subject: Re: C++ is not accepted for SRC block evaluation Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 16:35:10 +0000 Message-ID: References: <068D0D8C-238F-4D1A-A808-CA81DFD43F8B@scratch.space> <87lgc43l07.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bmd0u8np.fsf@gmail.com> <878t843iws.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874liru626.fsf@gmail.com> <87d0xd1jq5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fO44Z-00019o-8X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 May 2018 12:35:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fO44U-0001ZX-9H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 May 2018 12:35:39 -0400 Received: from iport-acv8-out.ucsd.edu ([132.239.0.21]:5944) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fO44T-0001Yn-QY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 May 2018 12:35:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87d0xd1jq5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: <5E8DD79E11E83844BDD4418C0247B852@AD.UCSD.EDU> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Van L , org-mode-email , John Kitchin > On May 30, 2018, at 4:11 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wro= te: >=20 > Hello, >=20 > Aaron Ecay writes: >=20 >> Improved documentation is never a bad thing. OTOH, I personally would >> not spend time on implementing the mapping you propose. >=20 > I simply added a footnote about C++ and D languages. >=20 >> org-babel-do-load-languages is IMO a relic. I think that all babel >> languages should be autoloaded, just like normal lisp libraries are. >=20 > But we still need a mechanism to selectively allow evaluation of some > source blocks based on their language. I guess some users expect to have > this. >=20 > Otherwise, it sounds good. >=20 >> If I had to sketch a design for this, it would be a macro like: >>=20 It would be nice to have a concurrent update to template.el for this scheme= . https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/worg/raw/master/org-contrib/babel/ob-template.= el Chuck =