From: M <Elwood151@web.de>
To: emacs orgmode-mailinglist <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: FW: How to deal with small projects which are often changing their status/ person
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 23:27:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CD24D0FC.13D26%Elwood151@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CD24CFD3.13D23%Elwood151@web.de>
> Von: M <Elwood151@web.de>
> Datum: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 23:22:59 +0100
> An: Thorsten Jolitz <tjolitz@googlemail.com>
> Unterhaltung: [O] How to deal with small projects which are often changing
> their status/ person
> Betreff: Re: [O] How to deal with small projects which are often changing
> their status/ person
>
> I agree, that sending edited documents by e-mail is not the best available
> approach.
>
> Using Google Docs for partly confidential information concerning products of a
> company is a no-go in my opinion (same for dropbox etc.)
>
> Maybe you misunderstood my initial question:
> it is not about a tool to keep track of changes to the documents, but a way to
> keep track of the project in MY todo-lists managed by org-mode.
>
> Some ideas I had in the meantime:
> - creating templates for such projects which already contain the "standard"
> sub-tasks.
>
>
>
>
>> Von: Thorsten Jolitz <tjolitz@googlemail.com>
>> Datum: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 22:55:15 +0100
>> An: <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
>> Betreff: Re: [O] How to deal with small projects which are often changing
>> their status/ person
>>
>> M <Elwood151@web.de> writes:
>>
>>> it is not about programming and it is not about plain text files, but MS
>>> Office (Word) files..
>>>
>>> Dropbox is not an option, maybe a document management system (DMS) with
>>> versioning, but it is not in place yet.
>>> And even if there is, how could I then track my workflow with Emacs?
>>
>> Maybe I shouldn't say this on this list, but this actually sounds to me
>> like a perfect use case for Google Docs, which is very similar to Word,
>> can import and export to Word (or simply replace it if the Docs are not
>> too complex), and is very well suited for collaborative work on the same
>> documents with automatic backup in the clouds and versioning.
>>
>> I think its all about avoiding to work locally on different copies of a
>> document and then send it back and forth by email. Thats just too
>> old-school in my eyes.
>>
>> --
>> cheers,
>> Thorsten
>>
>>
------ Ende der weitergeleiteten Nachricht
parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-22 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <CD24CFD3.13D23%Elwood151@web.de>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CD24D0FC.13D26%Elwood151@web.de \
--to=elwood151@web.de \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).