From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wtm Subject: Re: TODO keyword highlighting for headings with properties broken Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:59:19 -0500 Message-ID: References: <540750fd.c65a420a.4b18.3f7b@mx.google.com> <87bnqwd1r1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8738c8cwr4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87egvs8aqd.fsf@gmail.com> <54089ae9.8844440a.5c42.67f6@mx.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c16ec4c09fc9050242c95a Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48303) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPdBl-0005KV-6o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:59:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPdBg-0001vP-L6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:59:25 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c04::230]:59711) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPdBg-0001uU-GQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:59:20 -0400 Received: by mail-qg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id z107so10539900qgd.21 for ; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 12:59:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54089ae9.8844440a.5c42.67f6@mx.google.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --001a11c16ec4c09fc9050242c95a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Erik, Thank you! I just tried this out and it worked perfectly. This is a very useful command. With Emacs, it always seems like it's not whether I can do something but how! Will On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Erik Hetzner wrote: > At Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:30:11 -0500, > wtm wrote: > > > > Trevor, > > > > Thanks so much for mentioning this. I considered using these to roll > > back to 8/25 but I wasn't sure how much performance I would lose if > > I used the .el files instead of the compiled .elc versions. Or > > perhaps my assumption is incorrect? Is it ok to just byte-compile > > all of the .el files manually? I'm still very new to org-mode so > > please forgive my ignorance. > > Hi Will, > > You can install those packages using M-x package-install-file and you > will get a byte-compiled version. > > best, Erik > > -- > Sent from my free software system . > --001a11c16ec4c09fc9050242c95a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Erik,

Thank you!=C2=A0 I just tried= this out and it worked perfectly.=C2=A0 This is a very useful command.=C2= =A0 With Emacs, it always seems like it's not whether I can do somethin= g but how!=C2=A0

Will


On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Erik Hetzner = <egh@e6h.org> wrote:
At Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:30:11 -0500,
wtm wrote:
>
> Trevor,
>
> Thanks so much for mentioning this. I considered using these to roll > back to 8/25 but I wasn't sure how much performance I would lose i= f
> I used the .el files instead of the compiled .elc versions. Or
> perhaps my assumption is incorrect? Is it ok to just byte-compile
> all of the .el files manually? I'm still very new to org-mode so > please forgive my ignorance.

Hi Will,

You can install those packages using M-x package-install-file and you
will get a byte-compiled version.

best, Erik

--
Sent from my free software system <http://fsf.org/>.

--001a11c16ec4c09fc9050242c95a--