From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adriaan Sticker Subject: Re: meaningfull names for org-src buffers Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 17:07:59 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7ba9777431a7b0050394b337 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53749) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVikC-0002Sj-2x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:08:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVikA-0002A8-LV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:08:08 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]:43554) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVikA-00028n-BJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:08:06 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id p10so1325746wes.3 for ; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 08:08:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Grant Rettke Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" --047d7ba9777431a7b0050394b337 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well, I ussually just try to live with this limitation. :) I try to C-c ' in and out src block whenever possible so my my list with buffer names doesnt get to cluttered. Im also thinking about investigating the usefullness of polymode ( https://github.com/vitoshka/polymode) So I dont have to go to a different buffer all the time. Do you have any experience with this? Greetings 2014-09-21 15:49 GMT+02:00 Grant Rettke : > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Adriaan Sticker > wrote: > > I was wondering if it's somehow possible to give named org src buffer t= he > > name they were give in their #+NAME tag? Now there are just called > something > > like: > > *Org Src test.org[ R ]* > > > > But if you have multiple org-src buffers opened at the same time, its > hard > > to find the correct one back. > > Excellent idea. I've got so many small source blocks that it is too > difficult to make sense of > keeping multiple source block edit buffers open and limit them to one > at a time eg > > ,---- > | (setq org-src-window-setup 'current-window) > `---- > > How have you come upon your workflow of keeping multiple open and what > are some of the pros and > cons that you've found with it? > > -- > Grant Rettke > gcr@wisdomandwonder.com | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/ > =E2=80=9CWisdom begins in wonder.=E2=80=9D --Socrates > ((=CE=BB (x) (x x)) (=CE=BB (x) (x x))) > =E2=80=9CLife has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to = stop > taking it seriously.=E2=80=9D --Thompson > --047d7ba9777431a7b0050394b337 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Well, I ussually just try to live with= this limitation. :)
I try to C-c ' in and out src block whene= ver possible so my my list with buffer names doesnt get to cluttered.
<= br>
Im also thinking about investigating the usefullness of polymode (= https://github.com/vitoshk= a/polymode)
So I dont have to go to a different buffer all the= time. Do you have any experience with this?

Greetings

2014-09-21 15:4= 9 GMT+02:00 Grant Rettke <gcr@wisdomandwonder.com>:
On = Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Adriaan Sticker
<adriaan.sticker@gmail.com<= /a>> wrote:
> I was wondering if it's somehow possible to give named org src buf= fer the
> name they were give in their #+NAME tag? Now there are just called som= ething
> like:
> *Org Src test.org[ R= ]*
>
> But if you have multiple org-src buffers opened at the same time, its = hard
> to find the correct one back.

Excellent idea. I've got so many small source blocks that i= t is too
difficult to make sense of
keeping multiple source block edit buffers open and limit them to one
at a time eg

,----
| (setq org-src-window-setup 'current-window)
`----

How have you come upon your workflow of keeping multiple open and what
are some of the pros and
cons that you've found with it?

--
Grant Rettke
gcr@wisdomandwonder.com | http://www.wisd= omandwonder.com/
=E2=80=9CWisdom begins in wonder.=E2=80=9D --Socrates
((=CE=BB (x) (x x)) (=CE=BB (x) (x x)))
=E2=80=9CLife has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to st= op
taking it seriously.=E2=80=9D --Thompson

--047d7ba9777431a7b0050394b337--