+1 for keeping it in

i often debug my org based init config by launching emacs -Q and its great
to have org built in for that :)

Z

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com>
wrote:

>
> +1.
>
> (= Keep it in.)
>
> Yours,
> Christian
>
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I'd hate to see Org removed from Emacs.  It took a lot of work to get it
> > in, and I believe that the vast majority of Emacs users does not install
> > packages.  For a newbie to get to Emacs and to be able to open a .org
> file
> > is a big plus.  So my vote goes toward keeping it in.
> >
> > Carsten
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 10:22 AM, <aaermolov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> 2 cents from me...
> >>
> >> Besides I continuously see many users praising Emacs just for Org
> >> presence (they even may be completely non-technical users), I'm
> >> personally think Org may be removed from Emacs distribution because:
> >>
> >> 1) all Reuben's argument seems sane;
> >> 2) there are situations when someone wants particular version of Org,
> >>    and it may be not tne one bundled with Emacs. In this case someone
> >>    should perform extra steps to ensure things are going the right way.
> >>    When Org will be available only from ELPA, it will be SPOT for such
> >> cases.
> >>
> >> Reuben Thomas <rrt@sc3d.org> writes:
> >>
> >> > Now that Emacs has had package.el for some years, and Org is
> installable
> >> > directly from GNU ELPA, would it be a good idea to remove Org from
> >> Emacs's
> >> > source repository?
> >> >
> >> > The current situation is left over from before Emacs had package.el,
> and
> >> I
> >> > see no compelling reason to keep it. Org is too big and distinct to be
> >> > swallowed by Emacs; it doesn't make much sense to keep its current
> >> half-in,
> >> > half-out state; so logically it seems sensible to take it out.
> >> >
> >> > I am asking this question from an Org point of view; I will ask the
> Emacs
> >> > maintainers separately for their perspective.
> >> >
> >> > I think it would benefit Emacs too, as there would be less code to
> >> maintain
> >> > (even though Org is quasi-external at present, it still has to build
> >> > successfully as part of an Emacs build), and the Emacs distribution
> would
> >> > be slimmer for non-Org users.
> >> >
> >> > Of course, Emacs "distributions" would still be able to include Org
> >> > out-of-the box if they wished.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > http://rrt.sc3d.org
> >>
>
>
>