To continue... my first reaction to the bug was to
(setq org-beamer-frame-environment "frame")
to test. That resulted in
\newenvironment<>{frame}[1][]{\begin{frame}[environment=frame,#1]}{\end{frame}}
which is somehow weird and wrong.

This is why I propose to wrap the code in an
(unless (string= org-beamer-frame-environment "frame") ... )
so we are protected against people like me ;-)

Best, /PA

On Sat, 2 Mar 2024 at 07:24, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <
paaguti@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Leo,
>
> Wouldn't it be wiser to combine you fix with mine. I still think that
> setting org-beamer-frame-environment to "frame" when you don't need the fix
> and not emitting the extra newenvironment code in that case makes the
> generated LaTeX easier to read. Whether the default value should be frame
> org or orgframe is something we can debate.
>
> Best, /PA
>
> On Sat, 2 Mar 2024 at 00:12, Leo Butler <Leo.Butler@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Thanks for the bug report. The definition of the orgframe environment
>> did not pass the overlay spec to the underlying frame environment. I
>> believe the attached patch fixes that.
>>
>> Attached is an org file that appears to exercise the patch and show that
>> it is doing the right thing. Could you confirm this, please?
>>
>> ----
>> Incidentally, I did propose that we introduce a BEAMER_FRAME property so
>> that it could be manually set, but Ihor did not like that idea so it got
>> scrapped.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Leo
>>
>>
>
> --
> Fragen sind nicht da, um beantwortet zu werden,
> Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden
> Georg Kreisler
>
> Headaches with a Juju log:
> unit-basic-16: 09:17:36 WARNING juju.worker.uniter.operation we should run
> a leader-deposed hook here, but we can't yet
>
>

-- 
Fragen sind nicht da, um beantwortet zu werden,
Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden
Georg Kreisler

Headaches with a Juju log:
unit-basic-16: 09:17:36 WARNING juju.worker.uniter.operation we should run
a leader-deposed hook here, but we can't yet