Indeed, this seems to do the trick!
Thanks!

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Ista Zahn <istazahn@gmail.com> wrote:

> Can't you just do
>
> #+begin_src foo :wrap src bar
>    hello world
> #+end_src
>
> ?
>
> Best,
> Ista
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Dror Atariah <drorata@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is there some change in the status of this issue? Can one now specify the
> > language of the result?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dror
> >
> > ----------
> > Mahalo Tom,
> >
> > It looks like that's what I'll be doing for the ruby block.  That said,
> it
> > would be great if the :results code argument would allow a language
> > specification.
> >
> > Greg
> >
> >
> > On Jun 27, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
> >
> >> Greg Tucker-Kellogg <address@hidden> writes:
> >>
> >>> I have a Ruby block that creates some dot code.  I'd like to be able
> >>> to have the #+RESULTS block enclosed
> >>> in a src block that starts "#+BEGIN_SRC dot".  Using :results value
> >>> code generates the enclosing SRC block,
> >>> but using the same language (Ruby) used to generate the code.  Is
> >>> there a way to specify the coding language
> >>> of a generated #+RESULTS  src block?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Greg
> >>>
> >> Aloha Greg,
> >>
> >> This works for me with an emacs-lisp code block named harris-matrix that
> >> generates dot code.
> >>
> >> #+header: :var input=harris-matrix
> >> #+header: :file temp.pdf
> >> #+header: :cmdline -Tpdf
> >> #+header: :results output
> >> #+BEGIN_SRC dot
> >> $input
> >> #+END_SRC
> >>
> >> It's not quite what you were after, but it might help?
> >>
> >> All the best,
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> --
> >> Thomas S. Dye
> >> http://www.tsdye.com
>