On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>
> > I'm not an expert of HTML either.  However, the "p" tag inside the
> > "figure" is uncommon looking a bit on the example usages online.  Thus, I
> > agree with Matt that it should probably not be there.
>
> OK.
>
> > AFAIK, the CSS selector still differs so on the output side they are not
> > alike.  I.e. the former is "figure>img" the other is a "p>img".  Aside:
> If
> > anything, removing the "p" tag inside the figure would make it easier to
> > handle images.
>
> So would the following patch fix the issue?
>
>
I'm not sure. Doesn't look like it to me -- I would instead have put:

-        (format "\n<p>%s</p>" contents)
+        (format "\n%s" contents)

Because we never want the <p> tag inside the figure. Isn't that right?