From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Girard Subject: Re: [RFC] org-noweb: org-tangle + org-weave for literate programming using Org Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:18:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46931) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wudjr-0004sT-Hm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 04:18:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wudjq-0007FW-Gw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 04:18:31 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229]:38699) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wudjq-0007FP-Cn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 04:18:30 -0400 Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id c9so3966902qcz.14 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 01:18:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Grant Rettke Cc: emacs-orgmode 2014-06-10 19:54 GMT+02:00 Grant Rettke : > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Nicolas Girard > wrote: >> >> - About =org-babel-use-quick-and-dirty-noweb-expansion=: >> should it be set to 't' by default ? I'd be tempted to say yes, >> given the dramatic performance gain > Use Emacs to run Emacs Lisp and set > org-babel-use-quick-and-dirty-noweb-expansion to nil. Hi Grant, thanks for your reply. There might be a slight misunderstanding though. My question was: should org-tangle and org-weave enable "org-babel-use-quick-and-dirty-noweb-expansion" before doing their jobs ? For now I let the default value to be =nil=, and I was wondering if it wouldn't be bette to do the opposite instead, that is, enable "quick-and-dirty-noweb-expansion" by default and provide a -noquick option. What do you think ? Cheers, Nicolas