From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Girard <girard.nicolas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Babel] [possible bug] Empty src block prevents other block to
 expand
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 18:20:23 +0200
Message-ID: <CANMKmecxdDrk46OsWs_s1U6F71QSGxBKbsD_2d1wKr1MwBZcmA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANMKmeft59V00nF0nA-4tS58QnB9A11UiKgkZUz2hQ6Ff5N-Mg@mail.gmail.com>
	<loom.20140623T174920-577@post.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47411)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <girard.nicolas@gmail.com>) id 1Wz6zB-00036A-TB
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:20:54 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <girard.nicolas@gmail.com>) id 1Wz6z6-0005DF-F4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:20:49 -0400
Received: from mail-lb0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::233]:51892)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <girard.nicolas@gmail.com>) id 1Wz6z6-0005Cw-7E
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:20:44 -0400
Received: by mail-lb0-f179.google.com with SMTP id z11so4902123lbi.10
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 09:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20140623T174920-577@post.gmane.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Charles Berry <ccberry@ucsd.edu>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

2014-06-23 17:56 GMT+02:00 Charles Berry <ccberry@ucsd.edu>:
> Nicolas Girard <girard.nicolas <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> I think the diagnosis is incorrect.
>
> The empty source block has no effect.
>
> Adding ':noweb yes' to `capture's header args fixes things.
>

Charles,

thanks for your feedback.

I've always been under the assumption that, when block A references B
and B references C, then ":noweb yes" was only needed for block A. At
least, but perhaps I should double check, I'm pretty sure it's the way
I've been writing all my literal programming code until now.

So, in this specific example, ":noweb yes" shouldn't be necessary but
for the latest code block in the file.

Am I wrong ?

Cheers,
Nicolas