From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Hackney <dan@haxney.org>
Subject: Re: [proposal] org-test: Embedded self-tests in orgmode files
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 14:48:20 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMqXDZugFkE9HuRuMfye_qKyZMf5=u4G3ZQhFmrho4c131z1sQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMqXDZs4B6qbq0c98yh5ZAOd4jfTHefHZAAGuBXhQ7h3y7AQ1w@mail.gmail.com>
	<87a9l73kvk.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34418)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dan@haxney.org>) id 1V39Xn-0006YN-HI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 14:48:45 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dan@haxney.org>) id 1V39Xl-0006yo-Jp
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 14:48:43 -0400
Received: from mail-oa0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c02::231]:51384)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dan@haxney.org>) id 1V39Xl-0006y4-BC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 14:48:41 -0400
Received: by mail-oa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id n12so9891652oag.8
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87a9l73kvk.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> wrote:
> Daniel Hackney <dan@haxney.org> writes:
>
>> After finding that =fill-paragraph= has regressed again,
>
> Would you mind elaborating on that? I could have overlooked the problem.

I just started a separate thread about it.

--
Daniel Hackney