Hi Bastien On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Bastien wrote: > Michael Brand writes: >> [...] >> Also a small change against your latest patch to not stop at “%” >> without following “(” and possibly miss a “%(” before. This part that I changed between http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/1405 and http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/1408 got lost, the attached patch restores it. > Actually we don't need the whole emacs-lisp-mode so that > forward-sexp do something sensible. This is enough: > > (with-syntax-table emacs-lisp-mode-syntax-table ...) Thank you for the improvement, this is a very interesting `with-'. Michael