From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] org-fill-paragraph on #+TBLNAME
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:58:28 +0200
Message-ID: <CALn3zoiOo8Fqm28J5jqDuJYxrtJZZd3t2D9gLcw2bdYZhFvOcg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALn3zoj7ku+298fGM=KU08Wy9vnifEjO_VpyaBzrfgPhmRgumw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87zjwl79tg.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46706)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>) id 1UViES-0004HM-5c
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:58:36 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>) id 1UViEQ-0001Uz-Q4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:58:32 -0400
Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com ([209.85.217.172]:35739)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>) id 1UViEQ-0001Ue-Ib
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:58:30 -0400
Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id d10so887277lbj.31
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87zjwl79tg.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Nicolas

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> wrote:
> The error should be fixed.

Fix confirmed, thank you.

The ERT you added for this makes me wonder again: What is the status
of #+NAME for tables? Initiated by a discussion on the list some time
ago I thought I could and would better migrate all my #+TBLNAME
to #+NAME but since it still does not work for remote references like
this

#+TBLNAME: table
| 42 |

| 42 |
#+TBLFM: $1 = remote(table, @1$1)

I thought I did not understand the development of #+NAME. Are remote
references supposed to work also with #+NAME for tables?

Michael