From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Help on spreadsheet/calc references and improvements
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:59:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CALn3zohHr-sr1w33v4d3EzRK9peUizp9WgSu8do7CDAbotJ7HQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2013-10-05T16-39-57@devnull.Karl-Voit.at>
	<2013-10-06T13-22-35@devnull.Karl-Voit.at>
	<CALn3zohT56cm49RDQRi=uSXLcS4gVqozZ7YbgHT-L4MFaqRwFQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALn3zogYW0humF=o+tMC7Dikb5pEfNijjzB5U8mnRLe8bLmW=A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALn3zoh8a4AHz0utj-yO_0d+N0Ysegs-PAtS2QftNw90tmogxg@mail.gmail.com>
	<0934BC7C-2134-45D9-BF92-F8FCAC2D871C@gmail.com>
	<CALn3zogz3p8OOEyqcFJCzWSMJOC-+s5WO6kN111Q-Ug98giYBw@mail.gmail.com>
	<04CCC774-DD9A-4C11-860C-5FA0F378BE34@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48072)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>) id 1Vba3H-0004B3-K9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:59:32 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>) id 1Vba3G-0002od-HH
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:59:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <04CCC774-DD9A-4C11-860C-5FA0F378BE34@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Cc: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>, Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>

Hi Carsten

On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Carsten Dominik
<carsten.dominik@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 24.10.2013, at 22:47, Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Carsten Dominik
>> <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Applied, thanks.
>>
>> I can not see the commit, is it pushed?
>>
>>> Michael, would you like to have write access to the git repo?
>>
>> Thank you for the trust. As I would like anyway to have a review of my
>> patches before commit, I think it would not help when I would do the
>> commit myself. I hope that it is still ok when I prefer a review,
>> independent of the simplicity of the patch.
>
> Yes, reviews are always good!  But with write access you can still
> install a patch yourself after a review, or make small doc fixes
> without review etc.

Hi Carsten

Ok, I see that it would help when I "git push" those of my simple
changes that maybe don't need a review by a maintainer at any price to
the master branch myself. I already have write access to Worg, do you
still need my public key?

My question about the whereabouts of my patch
0001-Improve-manual-for-table-formulas.patch.txt that is already
"applied" has been overlooked and if I understand correct it is in
your repo but not yet in the main repo. Since the main repo changed
meanwhile, I assume it will create push conflicts on your side. If
this is correct then please get rid of the patch in your repo and I
will take care of the rest.

Michael