From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Brand Subject: Re: automating incrementing of date stamps Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 07:27:27 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:32871) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TY9y7-0007TB-Ky for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 01:27:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TY9y4-0008R0-J0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 01:27:31 -0500 Received: from mail-vb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41]:35448) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TY9y4-0008Qw-Er for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 01:27:28 -0500 Received: by mail-vb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id v13so537646vbk.0 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 22:27:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jude DaShiell Cc: Org Mode Hi Jude On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Jude DaShiell w= rote: > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Michael Brand wrote: > if S- means hold the shift key down then hit return, Yes. > in emacs > org-mode 7.9.2 this key combination did not increment the date stamp. What tells =93C-h c S-=94 in that place? Also check the manual section =933.1 The built-in table editor=94 about S- saying =93This ke= y is also used by shift-selection and related modes (see Conflicts).=94 or try emacs -Q. > When I keyed in the date stamp, I did it by hand keying in all of the > required characters myself since a couple of the dates are already in the > past. Could that have prevented proper date incrementing? No, it doesn=92t matter if you only type. But the powerful =93C-c . [...] RET=94 can be used also for dates in the past, replace =93[...]=94 with =9312-9-8=94, use shift with arrows, etc. > Could I get > around this block by entering the first date stamp as and the= n > trying shift-return from there on out to get the other needed dates in th= e > log? Such relative dates are not supported in tables but you can use =93C-c . -2 RET=94 etc. Michael