From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Brand Subject: Re: bug#9695: allowed date range Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 18:22:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87ty7kd8oh.fsf@kanis.fr> <87ehyiitv7.fsf__48109.1452217244$1318487785$gmane$org@googlemail.com> <87mxd5jqpn.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87lisp9vsm.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35607) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RM10C-0002HO-4N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:22:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RM109-0003cQ-Et for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:22:55 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:60855) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RM109-0003c5-6F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:22:53 -0400 Received: by wwe3 with SMTP id 3so1710152wwe.30 for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:22:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Tassilo Horn , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Carsten On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:27, Carsten Dominik wrote: > I am attaching a patch which will make time stamps without a day name > like <2011-10-12> work correctly. =A0Furthermore, pressing C-c C-c on > a time stamp will fill in or fix the day name. > > However, I am not sure if this patch is complete, or if it > has side effects. =A0So it would be good if a few people could > apply it and test it during their daily work for a few weeks, > and then report problems in this thread. I wonder how C-c C-c with a prefix (supported are one to three C-u) on a time stamp in a table field is expected to behave. In my opinion it should not only adjust the day name but like before also evaluate the table formula which it does not now. If the user does not expect and check the missing logs of the table calculation update he might wrongly assume that it happened and assume that there has been just no change. Michael