From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cesar mena Subject: Re: Do you like to have your TODOs at the same headline level? Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 09:15:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86bndus5nd.fsf@example.com> <86a8tdeuxk.fsf@example.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59058) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZWlPG-0006o6-QC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 09:15:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZWlPA-0007MV-QT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 09:15:22 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c05::234]:33904) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZWlPA-0007MA-Lj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 09:15:16 -0400 Received: by igcpb10 with SMTP id pb10so385915igc.1 for ; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 06:15:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86a8tdeuxk.fsf@example.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org i do the same; 4 char states - with box around them (setq org-todo-keyword-faces '(("TODO" . (:foreground "pink" :box (:line-width 1 :style none))) ("NEXT" . (:foreground "green" :box (:line-width 1 :style none))) ("WAIT" . (:foreground "yellow" :box (:line-width 1 :style none))) ("HOLD" . (:foreground "light blue" :box (:line-width 1 :style none))) ("CNC!" . (:foreground "gray" :box (:line-width 1 :style none))) ("DONE" . (:box (:line-width 1 :style none))))) -cm On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: > dboyd2@mmm.com (J. David Boyd) writes: >> Sebastien Vauban writes: >>> William Denton writes: >>>> I'm trying to spend more time in a sparse tree view where I just see >>>> TODOs (C-c / t). I didn't like having the TODOs at different levels >>>> of indentation, though. I prefer seeing them all lined up, so >>>> I moved them all to be fourth-level headline. It's visually >>>> pleasing, and I don't care if a second-level headline has >>>> a fourth-level child without a third-level one. >>>> >>>> Do other people do this? >>> >>> No, and I don't think that's sane. It would be logical to expect >>> problems at export time (to LaTeX, among others) and in Org-lint. >>> >>> I try to put all the tasks at the 2nd level, the 1st level being >>> reserved for big sections such as "Administration", "Tasks", "Team", >>> etc. >>> >>> I'm very rigorous about expecting that all my "project management" >>> documents can be exported (without loosing subtrees or generating error) >>> to HTML (as the very first goal) and to LaTeX (as the second one). >>> >>> OTOH, I don't deny your wish to get things aligned; that's why I've >>> opted to 4-char todo states only! >> >> 4-char todo states? How about a list? I can't picture how to >> abbreviate some things... > > Sure. Here it is: > > - TODO :: Open, not (yet) started. > - STRT :: In progress, working on, doing. > - WAIT :: On hold, assigned, feedback. > - SDAY :: Someday, maybe, perhaps, wish. > - DONE :: Completed, closed, resolved. > - CANX :: Wontfix, rejected. > > The only exception, but that's on purpose is "NEW" for things going to > the CollectBox. > > Best regards, > Seb > > -- > Sebastien Vauban > >