From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stelian Iancu Subject: bug#10125: 24.0.91; package.el (org): Macros in tar packages & order of byte compilation Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:32:55 +0100 Message-ID: References: <81pqgh90sp.fsf@gmail.com> <81ipm9l9kd.fsf@gmail.com> <81lir4anej.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58625) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTuyA-0006b5-HS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 07:33:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTuy5-0003Pl-Pg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 07:33:30 -0500 Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <81lir4anej.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jambunathan K Cc: 10125@debbugs.gnu.org On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 04:31, Jambunathan K wrote: > > Stelian > >> I am sorry to be asking a stupid question, but then, wouldn't restart >> Emacs fix the issue and have the new compiled org files loaded? In my >> case, that didn't seem to happen either (even though load-library >> showed org-compat to be from ELPA). > > locate-library doesn't show what is *already* loaded. It will only shows > what *will* be loaded. > > The most important thing during package compilation is this: Make sure > there is no running instance of Org in any form. If this condition is > not satisfied then to-be-installed files will be compiled with old > definitions of macro. This is not what we want. We want the new files to > be compiled with new macro definitions. > > Do things work for you when you start a *minimal* Emacs and *then* do > M-x list-packages -> install? You don't have to apply Glenn's patch to > get the desired behaviour (I am assuming here that you are probably not > that comfortable working with patches). > I will try with a minimal Emacs first. You're right, I don't know my way around patches that well :-). I am on OSX and I suppose I could use something like homebrew for including the patch and building. > Jambunathan K. > -- >