From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stelian Iancu Subject: Re: Org from ELPA question Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:38:54 +0100 Message-ID: References: <19292.1322122648@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTUpx-0000dD-Oc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 03:39:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTUpw-0008WP-0M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 03:39:17 -0500 Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:43215) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTUpv-0008WL-UE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 03:39:15 -0500 Received: by yenm12 with SMTP id m12so2825341yen.0 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:39:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <19292.1322122648@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:17, Nick Dokos wrote: > Stelian Iancu wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Org and Emacs newbie here. >> >> Using GNU Emacs 24.0.91.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin, NS >> apple-appkit-1038.36) of 2011-11-20 on bob.porkrind.org and Org from >> ELPA updated yesterday. >> >> I am encountering the problem with org-capture described here: >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/48584 >> >> After upgrading org yesterday, I can see that org-compat.el defines >> indeed the function org-pop-to-buffer-same-window. >> >> M-x locate-library tells me the following for org-compat: >> >> Library is file ~/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20111123/org-compat.elc >> >> So it seems that the correct one is seen. However, after require-ing >> org-compat, the function from above is still not known. Any ideas why? >> > > Probably because you did not compile the new .el files: it's picking up > the old .elc file which still exists. Check the modification times of > org-compat.el and org-compat.elc to make sure. > > Somebody else will have to tell you how to fix it though (whether the > above is correct or not): I've never played with ELPA packages. > Thanks for the suggestion, but I don't think that's it. I checked and the modification time of the .elc is newer. Also, I was thinking that since load-library shows me the ELPA one, it should be all good. Thanks, S.