Hi Vladimir, On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 03:21, Vladimir Nikishkin wrote: > > Can we replace the (set) on line 177 of ob-scheme.el with the following > form: > (setq result (if output > (let ((g-r-o (geiser-eval--retort-output ret))) > (if g-r-o > g-r-o > "Geiser-eval--retort-output returned nil.\nThe > interpreter produced no output\nor there is a bug in geiser (likely!)")) > (geiser-eval--retort-result-str ret ""))))) > > I am not super sure about what's going on there, but I think that output > can never be an empty list, because in the worst case it is an empty > string. > (But I wouldn't vouch for this.) > Can you explain more? Have you seen cases where (geiser-eval--retort-output ret) returns nil, even though you say just above that it can never do that? Best wishes, Neil