From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Federico Beffa Subject: Re: [PATCH] org.el: make org-paragraph-fill ignore \[...\] regions starting and ending a line Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 20:27:12 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87mwbbp45b.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44288) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGuJT-0007zB-O1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 14:27:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGuJO-0000HZ-KQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 14:27:19 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::229]:44353) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGuJO-0000HM-B1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 14:27:14 -0400 Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id s7so6209233lbd.14 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 11:27:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87mwbbp45b.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Rasmus On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Federico Beffa writes: > >> to help me understand what kind of problems one could face with HTML (or >> another back-end), could you give a concrete example? > > line 1 > line 2 > \[1+1\] > > ==> > >

> line 1 > line 2 > >

> > whereas > > line 1 > line 2 > \begin{equation*} > 1+1 > \end{equation*} > > ==> > >

> line 1 > line 2 >

> >

> >

> > IOW, there are two different structures in the document: > > ((paragraph latex)) > > vs > > ((paragraph) (latex)) > > even though M-q cannot tell that difference (with your proposal, the > behaviour would be the same in both cases). The example highlight the difference that I suggested to remove in the very first place (by making \[...\] an environment). This was rejected to preserve backward compatibility and that's fine. So I moved on to a second proposal: modify the paragraph filling function. Didn't the following comment in your previous reply refer to the second proposal? > Ignoring \[...\] when filling the paragraph is misleading. You may > believe the object doesn't belong to the paragraph at all. I think M-q > should, on the contrary, give clues about the structure of the document. > > Also, it doesn't make a difference when exporting to LaTeX, but it might > in back-ends with a different definition for paragraphs (e.g. HTML). >From your sentence in your last reply: "... even though M-q cannot tell that difference (with your proposal, the behaviour would be the same in both cases)." I understand that there is no technical deficiency in it. Am I therefore correct in saying that if you prefer not to include this proposal in org-mode it isn't for technical reasons but it is a matter of opinion/taste? I would like to know, because in any case I would like to use the proposed filling function in my copy of org-mode and if you see technical problems/errors I very much would like to be aware of them and, if possible, avoid/correct them. Regards, Federico