From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org>
Subject: Re: Bug: wrong interpretation of LaTeX [8.2.6 (8.2.6-47-ge3d2c1-elpa
 @ c:/Users/beffa/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20140526/)]
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:16:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKrPhPOXbU-cxQmts2XSe-QaSPS4gkzcWTLyYdtjTHA4XfiGkQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKrPhPO_yCOSE3uQcGAMscHXqa1qtBro=R-mcfSTtGvwTxaf3A@mail.gmail.com>
	<87fvhpjnmf.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAKrPhPOh1tkCtG49s2A3LgHauXVddE7f4+uDbBaZpiy=2zcnrQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87vbqkikzb.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAKrPhPOQgSWfdkPw1pUZdtpKpVfZQPc7NrEWOfz0hsN5LQn8BQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKrPhPPaFwAbFBB4hsYm9x+FCajgR+qb7nvC61qG9275Ldri6Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<87tx6221id.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35514)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <federico.beffa@gmail.com>) id 1XBiuX-0003A4-UV
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 07:16:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <federico.beffa@gmail.com>) id 1XBiuW-0006ml-Of
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 07:16:09 -0400
Received: from mail-lb0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::235]:53598)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <federico.beffa@gmail.com>) id 1XBiuW-0006ma-H1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 07:16:08 -0400
Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 10so5700826lbg.12
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 04:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87tx6221id.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>

In principle, to avoid breaking existing documents, you could
introduce a variable to set org-mode in legacy mode.

Regards,
Fede

On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org> writes:
>
>> In the end of the day the reason why I started looking into this is
>> the fact that I do not find user friendly that org-mode, when filling
>> a paragraph, interprets \[...\] as any inline snippet and does not
>> keep it on a separate line (as recommended by the LaTeX manual, see
>> attached document). That's it.
>
> As explained previously, I'm not against the idea, but it would break
> existing documents containing "\[...\]" in the middle of a line, even
> though it is valid LaTeX. In any case, you will not get total LaTeX
> conformance.
>
> Anyway, I can't see any technical limitation to your suggestion. So we
> might as well ask the ML. I'll write a consultative poll about it.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou