From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org>
Subject: Re: [POLL] Syntax change: make \[...\] non-inline (+1)
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 22:05:09 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKrPhPMzx0=ry8pbnKuDocSKwtWC=xp6WDMToB-7cvB1vv+ZxA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39540)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <federico.beffa@gmail.com>) id 1XE21n-0003bQ-Hp
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Aug 2014 16:05:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <federico.beffa@gmail.com>) id 1XE21m-0002cl-OS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Aug 2014 16:05:11 -0400
Received: from mail-lb0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e]:32832)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <federico.beffa@gmail.com>) id 1XE21m-0002ch-GU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Aug 2014 16:05:10 -0400
Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id c11so4665678lbj.19
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Aug 2014 13:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nick Dokos <ndokos@gmail.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

> It's a bit more complicated than that: one upgrades org at some
> opportune moment, then three months/years/centuries later, tries to use
> that presentation that worked perfectly before - boom. If you go back
> and check all your old presentations each time you upgrade org, you are,
> I would guess, the exception, not the rule. I certainly don't do that

Well, if I reuse an old presentation I usually use the old pdf.

> I generally put displays in separate paragraphs, I rarely use
> autofill[fn:1] and I'm happy to do M-q on individual paragraphs instead,
> but if I happen to do it on the wrong paragraph (backtraces, code
> fragments, displayed equations), undo is easy enough.

The problem with that is that a displayed equation should NOT start a
new paragraph (in the generated LaTeX file). This is because if it
does then LaTeX puts more (vertical) space than desirable.

Regards,
Federico