Hi Bastien, sorry for the late reply. On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Bastien wrote: > Hi Henning, > > Henning Weiss writes: > > > I was wondering why this patch was reversed in master. > > I think the line didn't change since 4a49e40d but I might be wrong. > > > An updated version of the patch is attached, and a discussion of what > > it does is below. > > Looks like the "updated" version is the same than the one you sent > first: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2012-01/msg00938.html > > ... and there is an updated one in the same thread: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2012-01/msg01073.html > > Which one should I apply? > > Could you add a commit message with an Emacs changelog to your patch? I have attached a better version of the patch instead. Henning