From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: feng shu Subject: Re: [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=. Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 07:09:35 +0800 Message-ID: References: <87k3l8q4vx.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d518e4b73c004e08f7042 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50926) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uu9hZ-0004jF-LF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:09:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uu9hY-0002oj-MK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:09:37 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]:61772) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uu9hY-0002oc-Fb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:09:36 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id m6so4648685wiv.14 for ; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 16:09:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87k3l8q4vx.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --047d7b5d518e4b73c004e08f7042 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Customize `org-latex-pdf-process isn't very convenient. Is it possible add a feature like: #+LATEX_PDF_PROCESS: latexmk or add #OPTIONS: ;latex_pdf_process latexmk Feng On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > feng shu writes: > > > From 63eba2e491a0c410b3841cbad2dd1a9f80416bca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Feng Shu > > Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:52:10 +0800 > > Subject: [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=. > > > > * ox-latex.el (org-latex-pdf-process): let =`make'= be a > > preconfigured choice and change the wording of the docstring. > > I don't mind applying it, but shouldn't it as simple to provide > a function that will call "make" instead? > > It's impossible to provide every solution in the wild for that. Is this > one really necessary: it doesn't have complicated arguments. > > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Goaziou > --047d7b5d518e4b73c004e08f7042 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Customize=C2=A0 `org-latex-pdf-process isn't= very conve= nient.
Is it possible add a=C2=A0 feature like: #+LATEX_PDF_PRO= CESS:=C2=A0 latexmk
or add=C2=A0 #OPTIONS:=C2=A0 ;latex_pdf_process=C2=A0 latexmk=

Feng


On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Nicolas Goaziou <= ;n.goaziou@gmail.c= om> wrote:
Hello,

feng shu <tumashu@gmail.com>= writes:

> From 63eba2e491a0c410b3841cbad2dd1a9f80416bca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001=
> From: Feng Shu <tumashu@gmail.= com>
> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:52:10 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] Let =3D`make'=3D be an option to =3D`org-latex-pd= f-process'=3D.
>
> * ox-latex.el (org-latex-pdf-process): let =3D`make'=3D be a
> =C2=A0 preconfigured choice and change the wording of the docstring.
I don't mind applying it, but shouldn't it as simple to provide
a function that will call "make" instead?

It's impossible to provide every solution in the wild for that. Is this=
one really necessary: it doesn't have complicated arguments.


Regards,

--
Nicolas Goaziou

--047d7b5d518e4b73c004e08f7042--