Hi,
Hi Bastien,
Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:
> I still find it strange to keep functions that are used nowhere in the
> Org's core--except of course for functions that explicitely mention as
> usable by the user (e.g. `org-clock-persistence-insinuate'.)
[snip]
And it's in org.el, so it's in Org's
"core", right? I guess we're thinking in different terms.
Inserting a subheading or subitem is a very common operation in an
outlining and list-making tool, so it would seem like a significant
regression to remove it.
I think there's an implied -and usually misleading‐ correlation between the importance of a function and the count of self-references -meaning uses in the defining package- shown from help buffers. It would be cool to see uses tracked as we byte-compile or something.
I'm not opposed to reorganizing the code, of course, as long as it
remains loaded as a command when org-mode is activated.
I'm a fan of interactive methods in obvious, easy to reach places.