From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Wales Subject: Re: [RFC] Small syntax change for footnote definitions Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:07:15 -0700 Message-ID: References: <8738wp3euv.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34398) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8awW-0002yA-6k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:32:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8awM-0000jR-Nd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:32:28 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com ([209.85.212.179]:58836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8awM-0000ih-HR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:32:18 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id ez12so7980889wid.12 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:32:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8738wp3euv.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Org Mode List Thank you for asking the list. Does this allow blank lines to separate paragraphs in inline footnote definitions? If so, it sounds very good. I presume we can still do === 1) a b. 1) c === On 2/21/13, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > I suggest to end a footnote definition at a headline, another footnote > definition or *two* blank lines. Samuel -- The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com The disease DOES progress. MANY people have died from it. ANYBODY can get it. There is no hope without action.