From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Where should I put the timestamp?
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 01:12:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJcAo8vezhPq6MkUrVW5Y_WL=z6N1VA9M2sN1z=4+i6Lfh1nxw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <871tob9ls3.fsf@amu.edu.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45251)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1XxtQP-0002J2-LN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 03:12:10 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1XxtQO-00076d-Du
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 03:12:09 -0500
Received: from mail-la0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::233]:48617)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1XxtQO-00076V-6V
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 03:12:08 -0500
Received: by mail-la0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ms9so3527556lab.10
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 00:12:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <871tob9ls3.fsf@amu.edu.pl>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl>
Cc: Org-Mode mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

from the user perspective, fwiw, in case it helps, i rely on headlines
like this.  they are far better for me than date trees, because you
can sort, show them all at a glance, binary search, less chance of
corruption, no extra hierarchy, etc.  they work great in my usage.

===
***** CONVERSATION [2014-12-07 Sun 22:23] called again
they never picked up though.
===

if org ever changes to not allow those, i will stick with the old org
version or carry along a patch in git.  :]


On 12/7/14, Marcin Borkowski <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I vaguely remember someone saying here on the list that putting
> timestamps in the headline is deprecated.  However, I found this in the
> manual:
>
> "A timestamp can appear anywhere in the headline or body of an Org tree
> entry.  Its presence causes entries to be shown on specific dates in the
> agenda [...]"
>
> Which is wrong: my memory or the manual?
>
> TIA,
>
> --
> Marcin Borkowski
> http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
> Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
> Adam Mickiewicz University
>
>


-- 
The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com

The disease DOES progress.  MANY people have died from it.  And
ANYBODY can get it.

Denmark: free Karina Hansen NOW.