From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Wales Subject: partly automating backporting [was Re: [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core] Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 15:24:08 -0700 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58348) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1etL0I-0003ag-QV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 17:24:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1etL0F-0006xg-9s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 17:24:12 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22e]:33344) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1etL0F-0006xJ-4Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 17:24:11 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id f1so779805iob.0 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 14:24:10 -0800 (PST) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 3/6/18, Achim Gratz wrote: > I haven't looked at how often changes to Org's manual actually originate > on the Emacs side in one development cycle of Emacs (which is generally > a year or more, but it can't be that much. it is an interesting technical question whether we can partly automate backporting.